Model comparison
Command A vs ERNIE 5.0 0110
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
BaiduSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 1 category and ERNIE 5.0 0110 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 43.0 to 27.2.
- Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Command A | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Baidu |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 41.8 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
Command A: 27.2 (#322), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94)
| Benchmark | Command A | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | 1455 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command A: 35.9 (#40), ERNIE 5.0 0110: —
| Benchmark | Command A | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
Reasoning Command A leads
Command A: 18.3 (#283), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297)
| Benchmark | Command A | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1445 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 10.3% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.7% |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
Command A: 36.2 (#171), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110)
| Benchmark | Command A | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1437 |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
Command A: 37.1 (#159), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Command A | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1428 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Command A: —, ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53)
| Benchmark | Command A | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1249 |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
Command A: 45.3 (#170), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49)
| Benchmark | Command A | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1436 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1512 |
| LMArena French | 1351 | 1467 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1460 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | 1382 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1446 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | 1473 |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
Command A: 69.1 (#177), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92)
| Benchmark | Command A | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1413 |
Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
Command A: 40.6 (#151), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95)
| Benchmark | Command A | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1422 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
Command A: 47.6 (#208), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66)
| Benchmark | Command A | ERNIE 5.0 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1445 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1426 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1434 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than ERNIE 5.0 0110?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command A or ERNIE 5.0 0110 better for coding?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command A and ERNIE 5.0 0110 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20.