Noometry

Model comparison

Command A vs GPT-5.4 Pro

GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index. Command A costs 15× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Command A Cohere

36.5

Rank #215 Confirmed

GPT-5.4 Pro OpenAI

58.9

Rank #18 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5.4 Pro in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.4 Pro leads 70.7 to 18.3.
  • Command A is cheaper at $2.50 / $10 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $180 for GPT-5.4 Pro.
  • GPT-5.4 Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.
  • Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Command AGPT-5.4 Pro
ProviderCohereOpenAI
Noometry Index36.558.9
Released2025-03-132026-03-05
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window256K1.05M
Max output8K128K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$30
Output $ / M tokens$10$180
Results tracked2416

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.4 Pro leads

Command A: 27.2 (#322), GPT-5.4 Pro: 43.2 (#90)

BenchmarkCommand AGPT-5.4 Pro
Aider Polyglot12%—
WeirdML—57.4%
LMArena Coding1330—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Command A: 35.9 (#40), GPT-5.4 Pro: —

BenchmarkCommand AGPT-5.4 Pro
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard57.1%—

Reasoning GPT-5.4 Pro leads

Command A: 18.3 (#283), GPT-5.4 Pro: 70.7 (#13)

BenchmarkCommand AGPT-5.4 Pro
ARC-AGI-2—83.3%
SimpleBench—74.1%
Kagi LLM Benchmark28.8%—
ARC-AGI-1—94.5%
CritPt—30%
Chess Puzzles—58.6%
EnigmaEval—23.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts1326—
DTBench61.3%—
LMCA10.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—158.93

Math GPT-5.4 Pro leads

Command A: 36.2 (#171), GPT-5.4 Pro: 72.4 (#22)

BenchmarkCommand AGPT-5.4 Pro
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—82.5%
FrontierMath Tier 4—58.5%
LMArena Math1300—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—50%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—37.5%

Knowledge GPT-5.4 Pro leads

Command A: 37.1 (#159), GPT-5.4 Pro: 68.3 (#7)

BenchmarkCommand AGPT-5.4 Pro
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.3%8.3%
GPQA Diamond—94.6%
Humanity's Last Exam—44.3%
SimpleQA Verified—46.3%
LMArena Expert1295—

Multilingual Not comparable

Command A: 45.3 (#170), GPT-5.4 Pro: —

BenchmarkCommand AGPT-5.4 Pro
LMArena Non-English1313—
LMArena Chinese1327—
LMArena French1351—
LMArena German1341—
LMArena Japanese1285—
LMArena Korean1285—
LMArena Russian1314—
LMArena Spanish1347—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Command A: 69.1 (#177), GPT-5.4 Pro: —

BenchmarkCommand AGPT-5.4 Pro
LMArena Instruction Following1309—

Long Context Not comparable

Command A: 40.6 (#151), GPT-5.4 Pro: —

BenchmarkCommand AGPT-5.4 Pro
LMArena Longer Query1334—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Command A: 47.6 (#208), GPT-5.4 Pro: —

BenchmarkCommand AGPT-5.4 Pro
LMArena Text1331—
LMArena Creative Writing1319—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1145—
LMArena Multi-Turn1339—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command A better than GPT-5.4 Pro?

GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index. Command A costs 15× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Command A or GPT-5.4 Pro?

Command A is cheaper. It lists at $2.50 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 Pro lists at $30 and $180.

Is Command A or GPT-5.4 Pro better for coding?

GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.2 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.4 Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Command A and GPT-5.4 Pro share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.4 Pro has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper