Model comparison

Command A vs Granite 4.1 8b

Command A and Granite 4.1 8b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (36.5 vs 37.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Command A Cohere

36.5

Rank #215 Confirmed

Granite 4.1 8b IBM

37.4

Rank #205 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 4 categories and Granite 4.1 8b in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Granite 4.1 8b leads 25.7 to 18.3.

Side by side

Command A and Granite 4.1 8b specifications
Command AGranite 4.1 8b
ProviderCohereIBM
Noometry Index36.537.4
Released2025-03-13—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window256K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$2.50—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked2413

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.1 8b leads

Command A: 27.2 (#322), Granite 4.1 8b: 30.1 (#297)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Coding13301312
Aider Polyglot12%—
LMArena WebDev—1192

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Command A: 35.9 (#40), Granite 4.1 8b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AGranite 4.1 8b
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard57.1%—

Reasoning Granite 4.1 8b leads

Command A: 18.3 (#283), Granite 4.1 8b: 25.7 (#143)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Hard Prompts13261293
Kagi LLM Benchmark28.8%—
DTBench61.3%—
LMCA10.3%—

Math Too close to call

Command A: 36.2 (#171), Granite 4.1 8b: 36.4 (#166)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Math13001312

Knowledge Too close to call

Command A: 37.1 (#159), Granite 4.1 8b: 36.1 (#174)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Expert12951309
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.3%—

Multilingual Command A leads

Command A: 45.3 (#170), Granite 4.1 8b: 41.7 (#204)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Non-English13131261
LMArena Chinese13271337
LMArena Russian13141240
LMArena French1351—
LMArena German1341—
LMArena Japanese1285—
LMArena Korean1285—
LMArena Spanish1347—

Instruction Following Command A leads

Command A: 69.1 (#177), Granite 4.1 8b: 66.9 (#203)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Instruction Following13091269

Long Context Command A leads

Command A: 40.6 (#151), Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#193)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Longer Query13341275

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Command A: 47.6 (#208), Granite 4.1 8b: 48.1 (#204)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Text13311290
LMArena Creative Writing13191251
LMArena Multi-Turn13391268
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1145—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command A better than Granite 4.1 8b?

Command A and Granite 4.1 8b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (36.5 vs 37.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Command A or Granite 4.1 8b better for coding?

Granite 4.1 8b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.1 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Command A and Granite 4.1 8b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.1 8b has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper