Model comparison

Command A vs Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Command A Cohere

36.5

Rank #215 Confirmed

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 xAI

37.7

Rank #198 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 6 categories and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads 37.0 to 27.2.
  • Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Command A and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 specifications
Command AGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13
ProviderCoherexAI
Noometry Index36.537.7
Released2025-03-132024-08-13
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window256K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$2.50—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked2417

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads

Command A: 27.2 (#322), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 37.0 (#199)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13
LMArena Coding13301269
Aider Polyglot12%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Command A: 35.9 (#40), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard57.1%—

Reasoning Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads

Command A: 18.3 (#283), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 24.8 (#159)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13
LMArena Hard Prompts13261255
Kagi LLM Benchmark28.8%—
DTBench61.3%—
LMCA10.3%—

Math Too close to call

Command A: 36.2 (#171), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 35.4 (#185)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13
LMArena Math13001265

Knowledge Command A leads

Command A: 37.1 (#159), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.9 (#200)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13
LMArena Expert12951238
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.3%—

Multilingual Command A leads

Command A: 45.3 (#170), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.4 (#208)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13
LMArena Non-English13131257
LMArena Chinese13271262
LMArena French13511286
LMArena German13411273
LMArena Japanese12851213
LMArena Korean12851195
LMArena Russian13141261
LMArena Spanish13471279

Instruction Following Command A leads

Command A: 69.1 (#177), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.5 (#220)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13
LMArena Instruction Following13091245

Long Context Command A leads

Command A: 40.6 (#151), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#196)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13
LMArena Longer Query13341266

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Command A: 47.6 (#208), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.3 (#211)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13
LMArena Text13311281
LMArena Creative Writing13191242
LMArena Multi-Turn13391265
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1145—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command A better than Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13?

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Command A or Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better for coding?

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Command A and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper