Noometry

Model comparison

Command A vs Hunyuan Vision 1.5

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.

Command A Cohere

36.5

Rank #215 Confirmed

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 Tencent

43.1

Rank #98 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 41.8 to 27.2.
  • Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Command AHunyuan Vision 1.5
ProviderCohereTencent
Noometry Index36.543.1
Released2025-03-13—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window256K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$2.50—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked249

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Command A: 27.2 (#322), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119)

BenchmarkCommand AHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Coding13301418
Aider Polyglot12%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Command A: 35.9 (#40), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —

BenchmarkCommand AHunyuan Vision 1.5
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard57.1%—

Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Command A: 18.3 (#283), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97)

BenchmarkCommand AHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Hard Prompts13261416
Kagi LLM Benchmark28.8%—
DTBench61.3%—
LMCA10.3%—

Math Not comparable

Command A: 36.2 (#171), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —

BenchmarkCommand AHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Math1300—

Knowledge Not comparable

Command A: 37.1 (#159), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —

BenchmarkCommand AHunyuan Vision 1.5
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.3%—
LMArena Expert1295—

Multimodal Not comparable

Command A: —, Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84)

BenchmarkCommand AHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Vision—1180

Multilingual Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Command A: 45.3 (#170), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125)

BenchmarkCommand AHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Non-English13131382
LMArena Chinese1327—
LMArena French1351—
LMArena German1341—
LMArena Japanese1285—
LMArena Korean1285—
LMArena Russian1314—
LMArena Spanish1347—

Instruction Following Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Command A: 69.1 (#177), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117)

BenchmarkCommand AHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Instruction Following13091397

Long Context Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Command A: 40.6 (#151), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115)

BenchmarkCommand AHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Longer Query13341404

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Command A: 47.6 (#208), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100)

BenchmarkCommand AHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Text13311405
LMArena Creative Writing13191388
LMArena Multi-Turn13391422
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1145—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command A better than Hunyuan Vision 1.5?

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Command A or Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better for coding?

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Command A and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper