Model comparison

Command A vs Granite 4.0 H Small

Command A and Granite 4.0 H Small score almost the same on the Noometry Index (36.5 vs 36.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Command A Cohere

36.5

Rank #215 Confirmed

Granite 4.0 H Small IBM

36.5

Rank #214 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 6 categories and Granite 4.0 H Small in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Granite 4.0 H Small leads 36.4 to 27.2.

Side by side

Command A and Granite 4.0 H Small specifications
Command AGranite 4.0 H Small
ProviderCohereIBM
Noometry Index36.536.5
Released2025-03-13—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window256K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$2.50—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked2419

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.0 H Small leads

Command A: 27.2 (#322), Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AGranite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Coding13301249
Aider Polyglot12%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Command A: 35.9 (#40), Granite 4.0 H Small: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AGranite 4.0 H Small
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard57.1%—

Reasoning Granite 4.0 H Small leads

Command A: 18.3 (#283), Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AGranite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Hard Prompts13261240
Kagi LLM Benchmark28.8%—
DTBench61.3%—
LMCA10.3%—

Math Command A leads

Command A: 36.2 (#171), Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AGranite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Math13001247
Omni-MATH—29.6%

Knowledge Command A leads

Command A: 37.1 (#159), Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AGranite 4.0 H Small
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.3%5.2%
LMArena Expert12951251
MMLU-Pro—56.9%
GPQA (HELM)—38.3%

Multilingual Command A leads

Command A: 45.3 (#170), Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AGranite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Non-English13131216
LMArena Chinese13271249
LMArena Russian13141201
LMArena Spanish13471258
LMArena French1351—
LMArena German1341—
LMArena Japanese1285—
LMArena Korean1285—

Instruction Following Too close to call

Command A: 69.1 (#177), Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AGranite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Instruction Following13091222
IFEval—89%

Long Context Command A leads

Command A: 40.6 (#151), Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AGranite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Longer Query13341242

Writing & Preference Command A leads

Command A: 47.6 (#208), Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AGranite 4.0 H Small
LMArena Text13311241
LMArena Creative Writing13191211
LMArena Multi-Turn13391242
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1145—
WildBench—73.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Command A better than Granite 4.0 H Small?

Command A and Granite 4.0 H Small score almost the same on the Noometry Index (36.5 vs 36.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Command A or Granite 4.0 H Small better for coding?

Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Command A and Granite 4.0 H Small share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 H Small has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper