Model comparison
Command A vs Llama 3.2 90B
Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
MetaSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Command A leads 33.5 to 10.4.
Side by side
| Command A | Llama 3.2 90B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2024-09-24 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Command A: 26.8 (#317), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1331 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Command A leads
Command A: 35.7 (#36), Llama 3.2 90B: 29.7 (#73)
| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
| BALROG | — | 27.3% |
Reasoning Llama 3.2 90B leads
Command A: 17.7 (#276), Llama 3.2 90B: 20.9 (#207)
| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.5 |
Math Command A leads
Command A: 33.5 (#172), Llama 3.2 90B: 10.4 (#302)
| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1300 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.4% |
Knowledge Command A leads
Command A: 36.5 (#157), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#269)
| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | — |
| MMLU | — | 80.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Command A: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 24.9 (#119)
| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1000 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Command A: 45.5 (#166), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | — |
| LMArena French | 1352 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Command A: 69.3 (#172), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Command A: 40.6 (#147), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Command A: 47.8 (#204), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than Llama 3.2 90B?
Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Command A and Llama 3.2 90B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.