Model comparison
Command A vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Command A leads 36.5 to 19.2.
Side by side
| Command A | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 32.2 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Command A: 26.8 (#317), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | Command A | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1331 | 1210 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command A: 35.7 (#36), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Command A: 17.7 (#276), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)
| Benchmark | Command A | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1208 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
Math Command A leads
Command A: 33.5 (#172), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)
| Benchmark | Command A | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1208 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
Knowledge Command A leads
Command A: 36.5 (#157), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)
| Benchmark | Command A | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | — |
Multilingual Command A leads
Command A: 45.5 (#166), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)
| Benchmark | Command A | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1187 |
| LMArena French | 1352 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | — |
Instruction Following Command A leads
Command A: 69.3 (#172), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)
| Benchmark | Command A | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1186 |
| IFEval | — | 78% |
Long Context Command A leads
Command A: 40.6 (#147), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)
| Benchmark | Command A | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1194 |
Writing & Preference Command A leads
Command A: 47.8 (#204), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)
| Benchmark | Command A | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1199 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | 1221 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?
Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command A or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.6 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command A and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.