Model comparison
Command A vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 36.5.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
- Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 256K.
- Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Command A | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 39.5 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 256K | 1M |
| Max output | 8K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $0.03 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | $0.13 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Command A: 26.8 (#317), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1331 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command A: 35.7 (#36), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Command A: 17.7 (#276), Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108)
| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.62 |
Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Command A: 33.5 (#172), Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100)
| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1300 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Command A: 36.5 (#157), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69)
| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Command A: 45.5 (#166), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | — |
| LMArena French | 1352 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Command A: 69.3 (#172), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Command A: 40.6 (#147), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Command A: 47.8 (#204), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Command A or Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 256K.
How many benchmarks do Command A and Qwen3.7 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.