Noometry

Model comparison

Command R+ vs Seed 2.0 Pro

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Command R+ Cohere

32.4

Rank #257 Confirmed

Seed 2.0 Pro ByteDance Seed

43.2

Rank #96 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 0 categories and Seed 2.0 Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 62.9 to 43.5.
  • Seed 2.0 Pro is cheaper at $0.50 / $3 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command R+.
  • Seed 2.0 Pro accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 128K.
  • Command R+ has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Command R+Seed 2.0 Pro
ProviderCohereByteDance Seed
Noometry Index32.443.2
Released2024-08-302026-02-14
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K256K
Max output4K128K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$0.50
Output $ / M tokens$10$3
Results tracked3420

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86)

BenchmarkCommand R+Seed 2.0 Pro
LMArena Coding11871472
BigCodeBench Instruct33.8%—
LiveBench Coding19.1%—
BigCodeBench Complete41.9%—
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+63.5%—

Reasoning Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165)

BenchmarkCommand R+Seed 2.0 Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts11861453
SimpleBench17.4%—
NYT Connections (extended)—28.4%
Thematic Generalization—57.1%
LiveBench Reasoning24.8%—
DTBench54.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis38.1%—
LMCA5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index119.34—
LiveBench31.8%—

Math Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108)

BenchmarkCommand R+Seed 2.0 Pro
LMArena Math11881439
LiveBench Math21.3%—

Knowledge Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122)

BenchmarkCommand R+Seed 2.0 Pro
LMArena Expert11741440
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.9%—
MMLU69.4%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Command R+: —, Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35)

BenchmarkCommand R+Seed 2.0 Pro
LMArena Vision—1274

Multilingual Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39)

BenchmarkCommand R+Seed 2.0 Pro
LMArena Non-English12161441
LMArena Chinese12261489
LMArena French12091471
LMArena German12161442
LMArena Japanese11661408
LMArena Korean11381411
LMArena Russian12271449
LMArena Spanish11891460

Instruction Following Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91)

BenchmarkCommand R+Seed 2.0 Pro
LMArena Instruction Following11971414
LiveBench Instruction Following57.6%—

Long Context Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90)

BenchmarkCommand R+Seed 2.0 Pro
LMArena Longer Query12301428

Writing & Preference Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69)

BenchmarkCommand R+Seed 2.0 Pro
LMArena Text12291448
LMArena Creative Writing12351406
LMArena Multi-Turn12131441
LiveBench Language29.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R+ better than Seed 2.0 Pro?

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Command R+ or Seed 2.0 Pro?

Seed 2.0 Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.50 per million input tokens and $3 per million output tokens; Command R+ lists at $2.50 and $10.

Is Command R+ or Seed 2.0 Pro better for coding?

Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Seed 2.0 Pro does, with 256K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Seed 2.0 Pro share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Seed 2.0 Pro has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper