Noometry

Model comparison

Command R+ vs Grok Build 0.1

Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.4 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Command R+ Cohere

32.4

Rank #257 Confirmed

Grok Build 0.1 xAI

36.4

Rank #216 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 32.2 to 9.2.
  • Grok Build 0.1 is cheaper at $1 / $2 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command R+.
  • Grok Build 0.1 accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 128K.
  • Command R+ has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Command R+Grok Build 0.1
ProviderCoherexAI
Noometry Index32.436.4
Released2024-08-302026-04-16
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K256K
Max output4K256K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$1
Output $ / M tokens$10$2
Results tracked343

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok Build 0.1 leads

Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Grok Build 0.1: 43.1 (#91)

BenchmarkCommand R+Grok Build 0.1
SciCode—50.2%
BigCodeBench Instruct33.8%—
LiveBench Coding19.1%—
LMArena Coding1187—
BigCodeBench Complete41.9%—
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+63.5%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Command R+: —, Grok Build 0.1: 22.7 (#129)

BenchmarkCommand R+Grok Build 0.1
GBAEval—2.4%

Reasoning Grok Build 0.1 leads

Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Grok Build 0.1: 32.2 (#77)

BenchmarkCommand R+Grok Build 0.1
SimpleBench17.4%—
CritPt—9.1%
LiveBench Reasoning24.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1186—
DTBench54.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis38.1%—
LMCA5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index119.34—
LiveBench31.8%—

Math Not comparable

Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Grok Build 0.1: —

BenchmarkCommand R+Grok Build 0.1
LiveBench Math21.3%—
LMArena Math1188—

Knowledge Not comparable

Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Grok Build 0.1: —

BenchmarkCommand R+Grok Build 0.1
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.9%—
LMArena Expert1174—
MMLU69.4%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Grok Build 0.1: —

BenchmarkCommand R+Grok Build 0.1
LMArena Non-English1216—
LMArena Chinese1226—
LMArena French1209—
LMArena German1216—
LMArena Japanese1166—
LMArena Korean1138—
LMArena Russian1227—
LMArena Spanish1189—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Grok Build 0.1: —

BenchmarkCommand R+Grok Build 0.1
LiveBench Instruction Following57.6%—
LMArena Instruction Following1197—

Long Context Not comparable

Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Grok Build 0.1: —

BenchmarkCommand R+Grok Build 0.1
LMArena Longer Query1230—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Grok Build 0.1: —

BenchmarkCommand R+Grok Build 0.1
LMArena Text1229—
LMArena Creative Writing1235—
LMArena Multi-Turn1213—
LiveBench Language29.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R+ better than Grok Build 0.1?

Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.4 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Command R+ or Grok Build 0.1?

Grok Build 0.1 is cheaper. It lists at $1 per million input tokens and $2 per million output tokens; Command R+ lists at $2.50 and $10.

Is Command R+ or Grok Build 0.1 better for coding?

Grok Build 0.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.1 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Grok Build 0.1 does, with 256K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Grok Build 0.1 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Grok Build 0.1 has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper