Model comparison
Command R+ vs Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
Command R+ and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.4 vs 31.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
NVIDIASummary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 4 categories and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Command R+ leads 43.5 to 31.6.
Side by side
| Command R+ | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 31.8 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 1025 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |
Reasoning Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads
Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1047 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |
Math Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads
Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1072 |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |
Multilingual Command R+ leads
Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1063 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | — |
| LMArena French | 1209 | — |
| LMArena German | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | — |
Instruction Following Command R+ leads
Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1060 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |
Long Context Command R+ leads
Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | 998 |
Writing & Preference Command R+ leads
Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1098 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 1058 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R+ better than Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat?
Command R+ and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.4 vs 31.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Command R+ or Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (29.1 vs 29.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9.