Model comparison

Command R+ vs Magistral Medium

Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Command R+ Cohere

32.4

Rank #257 Confirmed

Magistral Medium Mistral AI

35.2

Rank #227 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 2 categories and Magistral Medium in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Magistral Medium leads 39.1 to 29.1.
  • Magistral Medium is cheaper at $2 / $5 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command R+.
  • Magistral Medium accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Command R+ and Magistral Medium specifications
Command R+Magistral Medium
ProviderCohereMistral AI
Noometry Index32.435.2
Released2024-08-302025-03-17
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K262K
Max output4K16K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$2
Output $ / M tokens$10$5
Results tracked3422

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Magistral Medium leads

Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Magistral Medium: 39.1 (#161)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Magistral Medium
LMArena Coding11871319
SciCode—39.2%
BigCodeBench Instruct33.8%—
LiveBench Coding19.1%—
BigCodeBench Complete41.9%—
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+63.5%—

Reasoning Too close to call

Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Magistral Medium: 8.6 (#348)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Magistral Medium
LMArena Hard Prompts11861267
ARC-AGI-2—0%
SimpleBench17.4%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—16.2%
ARC-AGI-1—6.1%
CritPt—0.3%
LiveBench Reasoning24.8%—
DTBench54.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis38.1%—
LMCA5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index119.34—
LiveBench31.8%—

Math Magistral Medium leads

Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Magistral Medium: 35.1 (#189)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Magistral Medium
LMArena Math11881250
LiveBench Math21.3%—

Knowledge Command R+ leads

Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Magistral Medium: 33.5 (#202)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Magistral Medium
LMArena Expert11741223
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.9%—
MMLU69.4%—

Multilingual Magistral Medium leads

Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Magistral Medium: 39.6 (#224)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Magistral Medium
LMArena Non-English12161232
LMArena Chinese12261227
LMArena French12091267
LMArena German12161248
LMArena Japanese11661175
LMArena Korean11381125
LMArena Russian12271224
LMArena Spanish11891271

Instruction Following Magistral Medium leads

Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Magistral Medium: 66.0 (#211)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Magistral Medium
LMArena Instruction Following11971254
LiveBench Instruction Following57.6%—

Long Context Magistral Medium leads

Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#183)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Magistral Medium
LMArena Longer Query12301295

Writing & Preference Magistral Medium leads

Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Magistral Medium: 46.3 (#219)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Magistral Medium
LMArena Text12291255
LMArena Creative Writing12351245
LMArena Multi-Turn12131275
LiveBench Language29.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R+ better than Magistral Medium?

Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Command R+ or Magistral Medium?

Magistral Medium is cheaper. It lists at $2 per million input tokens and $5 per million output tokens; Command R+ lists at $2.50 and $10.

Is Command R+ or Magistral Medium better for coding?

Magistral Medium scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Magistral Medium does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Magistral Medium share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Medium has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper