Noometry

Model comparison

Command R+ vs Mistral Large 4

Mistral Large 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Command R+ Cohere

32.4

Rank #257 Confirmed

Mistral Large 4 Mistral AI

43.1

Rank #99 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 0 categories and Mistral Large 4 in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Mistral Large 4 leads 48.6 to 29.1.
  • Mistral Large 4 is cheaper at $0.68 / $2.09 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command R+.
  • Mistral Large 4 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
  • Command R+ has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Command R+Mistral Large 4
ProviderCohereMistral AI
Noometry Index32.443.1
Released2024-08-302026-10-06
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K1.05M
Max output4K262K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$0.68
Output $ / M tokens$10$2.09
Results tracked3415

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Large 4 leads

Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Mistral Large 4: 48.6 (#57)

BenchmarkCommand R+Mistral Large 4
LMArena Coding11871475
LMArena WebDev—1541
BigCodeBench Instruct33.8%—
LiveBench Coding19.1%—
BigCodeBench Complete41.9%—
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+63.5%—

Reasoning Mistral Large 4 leads

Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Mistral Large 4: 22.5 (#192)

BenchmarkCommand R+Mistral Large 4
LMArena Hard Prompts11861444
SimpleBench17.4%—
NYT Connections (extended)—27.4%
LiveBench Reasoning24.8%—
DTBench54.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis38.1%—
LMCA5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index119.34—
LiveBench31.8%—

Math Mistral Large 4 leads

Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Mistral Large 4: 40.4 (#91)

BenchmarkCommand R+Mistral Large 4
LMArena Math11881488
LiveBench Math21.3%—

Knowledge Too close to call

Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Mistral Large 4: 36.6 (#166)

BenchmarkCommand R+Mistral Large 4
LMArena Expert11741447
SimpleQA Verified—20%
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.9%—
MMLU69.4%—

Multilingual Mistral Large 4 leads

Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Mistral Large 4: 52.6 (#82)

BenchmarkCommand R+Mistral Large 4
LMArena Non-English12161415
LMArena Chinese12261491
LMArena Russian12271414
LMArena French1209—
LMArena German1216—
LMArena Japanese1166—
LMArena Korean1138—
LMArena Spanish1189—

Instruction Following Mistral Large 4 leads

Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Mistral Large 4: 75.0 (#76)

BenchmarkCommand R+Mistral Large 4
LMArena Instruction Following11971424
LiveBench Instruction Following57.6%—

Long Context Mistral Large 4 leads

Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Mistral Large 4: 43.6 (#89)

BenchmarkCommand R+Mistral Large 4
LMArena Longer Query12301429

Writing & Preference Mistral Large 4 leads

Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Mistral Large 4: 60.4 (#97)

BenchmarkCommand R+Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text12291427
LMArena Creative Writing12351361
LMArena Multi-Turn12131424
LiveBench Language29.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R+ better than Mistral Large 4?

Mistral Large 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Command R+ or Mistral Large 4?

Mistral Large 4 is cheaper. It lists at $0.68 per million input tokens and $2.09 per million output tokens; Command R+ lists at $2.50 and $10.

Is Command R+ or Mistral Large 4 better for coding?

Mistral Large 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Mistral Large 4 does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Mistral Large 4 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Large 4 has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper