Model comparison
Command R+ vs Muse Glimmer
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 32.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
MetaSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Glimmer in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Glimmer leads 27.2 to 8.9.
Side by side
| Command R+ | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 32.0 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
Command R+: 28.6 (#304), Muse Glimmer: 38.7 (#157)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 1417 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
Command R+: 8.9 (#341), Muse Glimmer: 27.2 (#111)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1395 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.28 | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
Command R+: 26.6 (#239), Muse Glimmer: 36.1 (#128)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1419 |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads
Command R+: 35.9 (#165), Muse Glimmer: 37.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | 1388 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
Command R+: 38.8 (#222), Muse Glimmer: 50.6 (#117)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1393 |
| LMArena French | 1208 | — |
| LMArena German | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | — |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
Command R+: 60.2 (#249), Muse Glimmer: 72.7 (#134)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1374 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |
Long Context Muse Glimmer leads
Command R+: 37.3 (#214), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#124)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1231 | 1381 |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
Command R+: 43.7 (#223), Muse Glimmer: 57.7 (#122)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1338 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 1398 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R+ better than Muse Glimmer?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 32.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command R+ or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Muse Glimmer share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 13.