Model comparison
Command R+ vs Olmo 7b Instruct
Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 3 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Command R+ leads 43.5 to 25.8.
Side by side
| Command R+ | Olmo 7b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 30.3 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 1016 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 7b Instruct leads
Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 993 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |
Math Olmo 7b Instruct leads
Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1018 |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |
Multilingual Command R+ leads
Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | 1014 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 947 |
| LMArena French | 1209 | — |
| LMArena German | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | — |
Instruction Following Command R+ leads
Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 978 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | — |
Writing & Preference Command R+ leads
Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 1007 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R+ better than Olmo 7b Instruct?
Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command R+ or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (29.1 vs 29.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Olmo 7b Instruct share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.