Model comparison
Command R+ vs Palm 2
Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
GoogleSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 5 categories and Palm 2 in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Command R+ leads 43.5 to 25.6.
- Command R+ has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Command R+ | Palm 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 30.0 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Palm 2: 29.0 (#311)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 994 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |
Reasoning Palm 2 leads
Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Palm 2: 19.1 (#271)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1005 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |
Math Palm 2 leads
Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Palm 2: 30.8 (#231)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1049 |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Palm 2: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |
Multilingual Command R+ leads
Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Palm 2: 20.9 (#295)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 916 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | 887 |
| LMArena French | 1209 | — |
| LMArena German | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | — |
Instruction Following Command R+ leads
Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Palm 2: 51.0 (#296)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1010 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |
Long Context Command R+ leads
Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Palm 2: 30.8 (#285)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | 1010 |
Writing & Preference Command R+ leads
Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Palm 2: 25.6 (#304)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1027 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 991 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 994 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R+ better than Palm 2?
Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command R+ or Palm 2 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (29.1 vs 29.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Palm 2 share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Palm 2 has 10.