Model comparison
Command R+ vs phi-3-medium 14B
Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 2 categories and phi-3-medium 14B in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Command R+ leads 36.4 to 9.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 41.9% for Command R+ and 48.7% for phi-3-medium 14B.
Side by side
| Command R+ | phi-3-medium 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding phi-3-medium 14B leads
Command R+: 29.1 (#309), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | 37.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | 48.7% |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Command R+: 9.2 (#344), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | 121.23 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |
Math Command R+ leads
Command R+: 28.9 (#242), phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1188 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |
Knowledge Command R+ leads
Command R+: 36.4 (#169), phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 69.4% | 78% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Command R+: 38.6 (#227), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | — |
| LMArena French | 1209 | — |
| LMArena German | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Command R+: 60.0 (#254), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Command R+: 37.3 (#219), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Command R+: 43.5 (#228), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R+ better than phi-3-medium 14B?
Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command R+ or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?
phi-3-medium 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.8 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command R+ and phi-3-medium 14B share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.