Model comparison
Command R+ vs Qwen3-4B
Command R+ and Qwen3-4B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.4 vs 31.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3-4B in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3-4B leads 19.2 to 9.2.
Side by side
| Command R+ | Qwen3-4B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 31.9 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command R+: —, Qwen3-4B: 27.6 (#100)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 35.7% |
Reasoning Qwen3-4B leads
Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Qwen3-4B: 19.2 (#268)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |
Math Too close to call
Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Qwen3-4B: 29.7 (#240)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 38.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 52.2% |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1188 | — |
Knowledge Command R+ leads
Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#208)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | 5.7% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 52.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | — |
| LMArena French | 1209 | — |
| LMArena German | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R+ better than Qwen3-4B?
Command R+ and Qwen3-4B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.4 vs 31.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Qwen3-4B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.