Model comparison
Command R+ vs Wizardlm 13b
Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.0 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 4 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Command R+ leads 43.7 to 30.7.
Side by side
| Command R+ | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 32.0 | 30.8 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Command R+: 28.6 (#304), Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 1035 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |
Reasoning Wizardlm 13b leads
Command R+: 8.9 (#341), Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1018 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.28 | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |
Math Wizardlm 13b leads
Command R+: 26.6 (#239), Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1017 |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Command R+: 35.9 (#165), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |
Multilingual Command R+ leads
Command R+: 38.8 (#222), Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1208 | — |
| LMArena German | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | — |
Instruction Following Command R+ leads
Command R+: 60.2 (#249), Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1049 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |
Long Context Command R+ leads
Command R+: 37.3 (#214), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1231 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Command R+ leads
Command R+: 43.7 (#223), Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1090 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 1047 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R+ better than Wizardlm 13b?
Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.0 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command R+ or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (28.6 vs 29.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.