Model comparison
Command R vs Llama 3-70B
Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.0 to 28.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
MetaSummary
- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 4 categories and Llama 3-70B in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Command R leads 25.8 to 12.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 45.2% for Command R and 54.5% for Llama 3-70B.
Side by side
| Command R | Llama 3-70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 28.5 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2024-04-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 29 | 31 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Llama 3-70B leads
Command R: 28.8 (#301), Llama 3-70B: 35.3 (#215)
| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | 43.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1170 | 1206 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | 54.5% |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 72% |
| MBPP+ | — | 69% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command R: —, Llama 3-70B: 20.9 (#132)
| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 5% |
Reasoning Llama 3-70B leads
Command R: 13.3 (#329), Llama 3-70B: 17.4 (#284)
| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1195 |
| DTBench | 46.4% | 54.2% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 35.1% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 122.91 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.1 |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
| WinoGrande | — | 83.5% |
Math Command R leads
Command R: 25.8 (#244), Llama 3-70B: 12.0 (#299)
| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1218 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 4.3% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 22.6% |
Knowledge Command R leads
Command R: 30.5 (#219), Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#272)
| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1149 |
| MMLU | 65.2% | 79.3% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 40.6% |
Multilingual Command R leads
Command R: 35.9 (#240), Llama 3-70B: 33.8 (#246)
| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1114 |
| LMArena French | 1161 | 1231 |
| LMArena German | 1176 | 1169 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | 1017 |
| LMArena Korean | 1162 | 1017 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1159 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1150 | 1241 |
Instruction Following Llama 3-70B leads
Command R: 58.3 (#256), Llama 3-70B: 62.8 (#233)
| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1194 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
Long Context Too close to call
Command R: 36.3 (#226), Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#235)
| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1174 |
Writing & Preference Llama 3-70B leads
Command R: 38.4 (#248), Llama 3-70B: 43.0 (#225)
| Benchmark | Command R | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1221 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1210 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1223 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R better than Llama 3-70B?
Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.0 to 28.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command R or Llama 3-70B better for coding?
Llama 3-70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.3 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command R and Llama 3-70B share?
21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-70B has 31.