Model comparison
Command R vs Longcat Flash Chat
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
CohereSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and Longcat Flash Chat in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 61.2 to 38.4.
Side by side
| Command R | Longcat Flash Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Meituan |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 41.5 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 29 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads
Command R: 28.8 (#301), Longcat Flash Chat: 42.9 (#85)
| Benchmark | Command R | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1170 | 1471 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning Longcat Flash Chat leads
Command R: 13.3 (#329), Longcat Flash Chat: 18.3 (#267)
| Benchmark | Command R | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1440 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 43.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 17.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
Math Longcat Flash Chat leads
Command R: 25.8 (#244), Longcat Flash Chat: 36.6 (#107)
| Benchmark | Command R | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1441 |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
Knowledge Longcat Flash Chat leads
Command R: 30.5 (#219), Longcat Flash Chat: 40.0 (#111)
| Benchmark | Command R | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1454 |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |
Multilingual Longcat Flash Chat leads
Command R: 35.9 (#240), Longcat Flash Chat: 52.1 (#95)
| Benchmark | Command R | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1465 |
| LMArena French | 1161 | 1457 |
| LMArena German | 1176 | 1409 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | 1373 |
| LMArena Korean | 1162 | 1372 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1396 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1150 | 1445 |
Instruction Following Longcat Flash Chat leads
Command R: 58.3 (#256), Longcat Flash Chat: 74.6 (#92)
| Benchmark | Command R | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1411 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
Long Context Longcat Flash Chat leads
Command R: 36.3 (#226), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#89)
| Benchmark | Command R | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1425 |
Writing & Preference Longcat Flash Chat leads
Command R: 38.4 (#248), Longcat Flash Chat: 61.2 (#88)
| Benchmark | Command R | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1427 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1418 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R better than Longcat Flash Chat?
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command R or Longcat Flash Chat better for coding?
Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command R and Longcat Flash Chat share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Longcat Flash Chat has 19.