Model comparison
Command R vs o1-pro
Command R and o1-pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.4 vs 31.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
CohereSummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where o1-pro leads 20.4 to 13.8.
- Command R is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $150 / $600 for o1-pro.
- o1-pro accepts more context: 200K tokens versus 128K.
- Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Command R | o1-pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 31.5 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2025-03-19 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | 200K |
| Max output | 4K | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | $150 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | $600 |
| Results tracked | 29 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Command R: 29.3 (#306), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | Command R | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning o1-pro leads
Command R: 13.8 (#331), o1-pro: 20.4 (#239)
| Benchmark | Command R | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 23.3% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 6.1% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
Math Not comparable
Command R: 28.0 (#246), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | Command R | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1155 | — |
Knowledge Command R leads
Command R: 31.0 (#221), o1-pro: 29.7 (#234)
| Benchmark | Command R | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Command R: 35.7 (#245), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | Command R | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | — |
| LMArena French | 1162 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Command R: 58.1 (#261), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | Command R | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Command R: 36.3 (#231), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | Command R | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Command R: 38.2 (#254), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | Command R | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R better than o1-pro?
Command R and o1-pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.4 vs 31.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Command R or o1-pro?
Command R is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; o1-pro lists at $150 and $600.
Which has the bigger context window?
o1-pro does, with 200K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Command R and o1-pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and o1-pro has 3.