Model comparison
Command R vs Olmo 7b Instruct
Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.0 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 3 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Command R leads 38.4 to 26.0.
Side by side
| Command R | Olmo 7b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 29 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Command R: 28.8 (#301), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Command R | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1170 | 1016 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 7b Instruct leads
Command R: 13.3 (#329), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Command R | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 993 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
Math Olmo 7b Instruct leads
Command R: 25.8 (#244), Olmo 7b Instruct: 27.8 (#234)
| Benchmark | Command R | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1018 |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Command R: 30.5 (#219), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |
Multilingual Command R leads
Command R: 35.9 (#240), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.1 (#286)
| Benchmark | Command R | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1013 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 946 |
| LMArena French | 1161 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1162 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1150 | — |
Instruction Following Command R leads
Command R: 58.3 (#256), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.3 (#296)
| Benchmark | Command R | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 978 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Command R: 36.3 (#226), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | — |
Writing & Preference Command R leads
Command R: 38.4 (#248), Olmo 7b Instruct: 26.0 (#298)
| Benchmark | Command R | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1007 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R better than Olmo 7b Instruct?
Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.0 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command R or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (28.8 vs 29.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Command R and Olmo 7b Instruct share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.