Model comparison
Command R vs Qwen-14B
Command R and Qwen-14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.4 vs 31.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen-14B in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Command R leads 38.2 to 27.6.
Side by side
| Command R | Qwen-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2023-09-24 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 29 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen-14B leads
Command R: 29.3 (#306), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)
| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | 1071 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning Qwen-14B leads
Command R: 13.8 (#331), Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)
| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1027 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 113.03 |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |
Math Qwen-14B leads
Command R: 28.0 (#246), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)
| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1068 |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Command R: 31.0 (#221), Qwen-14B: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 65.2% | 66.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
Multilingual Command R leads
Command R: 35.7 (#245), Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)
| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1041 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1077 |
| LMArena French | 1162 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | — |
Instruction Following Command R leads
Command R: 58.1 (#261), Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)
| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1031 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
Long Context Command R leads
Command R: 36.3 (#231), Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)
| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1028 |
Writing & Preference Command R leads
Command R: 38.2 (#254), Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)
| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1022 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R better than Qwen-14B?
Command R and Qwen-14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.4 vs 31.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Command R or Qwen-14B better for coding?
Qwen-14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.2 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command R and Qwen-14B share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.