Model comparison
Command R vs Wizardlm 70b
Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 4 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Wizardlm 70b leads 20.7 to 13.8.
Side by side
| Command R | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 33.0 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 29 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Wizardlm 70b leads
Command R: 29.3 (#306), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)
| Benchmark | Command R | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | 1081 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning Wizardlm 70b leads
Command R: 13.8 (#331), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)
| Benchmark | Command R | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1079 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
Math Wizardlm 70b leads
Command R: 28.0 (#246), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)
| Benchmark | Command R | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1116 |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Command R: 31.0 (#221), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | Command R | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |
Multilingual Command R leads
Command R: 35.7 (#245), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)
| Benchmark | Command R | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1052 |
| LMArena German | 1176 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1155 |
| LMArena French | 1162 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | — |
Instruction Following Command R leads
Command R: 58.1 (#261), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)
| Benchmark | Command R | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1093 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
Long Context Command R leads
Command R: 36.3 (#231), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)
| Benchmark | Command R | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1097 |
Writing & Preference Command R leads
Command R: 38.2 (#254), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)
| Benchmark | Command R | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1108 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R better than Wizardlm 70b?
Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command R or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?
Wizardlm 70b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.4 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command R and Wizardlm 70b share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.