Model comparison

Command R7B vs GPT-6 Sol

GPT-6 Sol has enough public results to be ranked (#12); Command R7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Command R7B Cohere

32.5

Unranked Sparse

GPT-6 Sol OpenAI

61.8

Rank #12 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where GPT-6 Sol leads 37.2 to 26.1.
  • Command R7B is cheaper at $0.0375 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $10 for GPT-6 Sol.
  • GPT-6 Sol accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
  • Command R7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Command R7B and GPT-6 Sol specifications
Command R7BGPT-6 Sol
ProviderCohereOpenAI
Noometry Index32.561.8
Released2024-12-022026-09-22
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K1.05M
Max output4K128K
Input $ / M tokens$0.0375$2
Output $ / M tokens$0.15$10
Results tracked145

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Command R7B: —, GPT-6 Sol: 60.1 (#11)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R7BGPT-6 Sol
DeepSWE—68.8%
FrontierCode—49.3%
LMArena WebDev—1688
SciCode—57.6%
LMArena Coding—1447
ALE-Bench—2,462

Agentic & Tool Use GPT-6 Sol leads

Command R7B: 26.1, GPT-6 Sol: 37.2 (#36)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R7BGPT-6 Sol
APEX-Agents—54.3%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard32.1%—
GDP.pdf—26.4%
Vending-Bench 2—14,428

Reasoning Not comparable

Command R7B: —, GPT-6 Sol: 74.0 (#9)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R7BGPT-6 Sol
ARC-AGI-2—89.6%
NYT Connections (extended)—90.1%
ARC-AGI-1—95.5%
CritPt—30.9%
EBR-Bench—53.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1418
Mystery Game Puzzles—56%
DTBench—97.3%
LMCA—59.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—162.72

Math Not comparable

Command R7B: —, GPT-6 Sol: 87.2 (#7)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R7BGPT-6 Sol
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—89.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4—90%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—100%
ProofBench—83%
LMArena Math—1402

Knowledge Not comparable

Command R7B: —, GPT-6 Sol: 64.8 (#15)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R7BGPT-6 Sol
GPQA Diamond—94.3%
SimpleQA Verified—60.7%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—6.5%
LMArena Expert—1439

Multimodal Not comparable

Command R7B: —, GPT-6 Sol: 47.6 (#10)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R7BGPT-6 Sol
LMArena Vision—1245
Blueprint-Bench 2—36.9%
Furniture Assembly—58.3%

Multilingual Not comparable

Command R7B: —, GPT-6 Sol: 50.5 (#118)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R7BGPT-6 Sol
LMArena Non-English—1385
LMArena Chinese—1405
LMArena French—1410
LMArena German—1390
LMArena Japanese—1385
LMArena Korean—1341
LMArena Russian—1401
LMArena Spanish—1384

Instruction Following Not comparable

Command R7B: —, GPT-6 Sol: 74.5 (#94)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R7BGPT-6 Sol
LMArena Instruction Following—1412

Long Context Not comparable

Command R7B: —, GPT-6 Sol: 43.1 (#108)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R7BGPT-6 Sol
LMArena Longer Query—1411

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Command R7B: —, GPT-6 Sol: 71.9 (#18)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R7BGPT-6 Sol
LMArena Text—1395
LMArena Creative Writing—1378
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—2125
LMArena Multi-Turn—1412

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R7B better than GPT-6 Sol?

GPT-6 Sol has enough public results to be ranked (#12); Command R7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Command R7B or GPT-6 Sol?

Command R7B is cheaper. It lists at $0.0375 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; GPT-6 Sol lists at $2 and $10.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-6 Sol does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Command R7B and GPT-6 Sol share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R7B has 1 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6 Sol has 45.

Related comparisons

Go deeper