Model comparison
Command R7B vs Muse Spark 1.2
Muse Spark 1.2 has enough public results to be ranked (#48); Command R7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
MetaSummary
- The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 29.4 to 26.1.
- Command R7B is cheaper at $0.0375 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $4.25 for Muse Spark 1.2.
- Muse Spark 1.2 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
- Command R7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Command R7B | Muse Spark 1.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 50.3 |
| Released | 2024-12-02 | 2026-08-05 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | 1.05M |
| Max output | 4K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.0375 | $1.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.15 | $4.25 |
| Results tracked | 1 | 31 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Command R7B: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 49.2 (#51)
| Benchmark | Command R7B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 54.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1533 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 12% |
| SciCode | — | 56.4% |
| WeirdML | — | 60.3% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1495 |
Agentic & Tool Use Muse Spark 1.2 leads
Command R7B: 26.1, Muse Spark 1.2: 29.4 (#87)
| Benchmark | Command R7B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 36.4% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 32.1% | — |
| GDP.pdf | — | 16% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Command R7B: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 51.3 (#34)
| Benchmark | Command R7B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 74.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 79.2% |
| CritPt | — | 17.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1486 |
| DTBench | — | 94.7% |
| LMCA | — | 48.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 154.87 |
Math Not comparable
Command R7B: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 46.4 (#70)
| Benchmark | Command R7B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 43% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1471 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Command R7B: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 54.1 (#53)
| Benchmark | Command R7B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 60.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1480 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Command R7B: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 43.4 (#25)
| Benchmark | Command R7B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1305 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Command R7B: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 57.1 (#11)
| Benchmark | Command R7B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1478 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1511 |
| LMArena French | — | 1513 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1487 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1498 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Command R7B: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 76.7 (#36)
| Benchmark | Command R7B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1461 |
Long Context Not comparable
Command R7B: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 45.2 (#48)
| Benchmark | Command R7B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1475 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Command R7B: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 72.3 (#14)
| Benchmark | Command R7B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1482 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1449 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1840 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1494 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R7B better than Muse Spark 1.2?
Muse Spark 1.2 has enough public results to be ranked (#48); Command R7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Which is cheaper, Command R7B or Muse Spark 1.2?
Command R7B is cheaper. It lists at $0.0375 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.2 lists at $1.25 and $4.25.
Which has the bigger context window?
Muse Spark 1.2 does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Command R7B and Muse Spark 1.2 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R7B has 1 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.2 has 31.