Noometry

Model comparison

Command R7B vs Muse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 has enough public results to be ranked (#27); Command R7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Command R7B Cohere

32.5

Unranked Sparse

Muse Spark 1.3 Meta

54.8

Rank #27 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Muse Spark 1.3 leads 38.6 to 26.1.
  • Command R7B is cheaper at $0.0375 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $4.25 for Muse Spark 1.3.
  • Muse Spark 1.3 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
  • Command R7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Command R7BMuse Spark 1.3
ProviderCohereMeta
Noometry Index32.554.8
Released2024-12-022026-09-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K1.05M
Max output4K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.0375$1.25
Output $ / M tokens$0.15$4.25
Results tracked137

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Command R7B: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 56.6 (#21)

BenchmarkCommand R7BMuse Spark 1.3
CursorBench—41.6%
LMArena WebDev—1657
SciCode—59.7%
LMArena Coding—1514

Agentic & Tool Use Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Command R7B: 26.1, Muse Spark 1.3: 38.6 (#30)

BenchmarkCommand R7BMuse Spark 1.3
APEX-Agents—57.8%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard32.1%—
GDP.pdf—27.6%

Reasoning Not comparable

Command R7B: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 54.0 (#27)

BenchmarkCommand R7BMuse Spark 1.3
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
CritPt—26%
Chess Puzzles—38%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1503
Mystery Game Puzzles—25%
DTBench—96.5%
LMCA—53.9%
Bench to the Future 3—0.14
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.75

Math Not comparable

Command R7B: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 73.1 (#21)

BenchmarkCommand R7BMuse Spark 1.3
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4—46.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—99.2%
ProofBench—58%
LMArena Math—1494

Knowledge Not comparable

Command R7B: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 42.6 (#95)

BenchmarkCommand R7BMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Expert—1516

Multimodal Not comparable

Command R7B: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 43.7 (#22)

BenchmarkCommand R7BMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision—1309
LMArena Document—1471

Multilingual Not comparable

Command R7B: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 57.4 (#8)

BenchmarkCommand R7BMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Non-English—1481
LMArena Chinese—1529
LMArena French—1524
LMArena German—1515
LMArena Japanese—1474
LMArena Korean—1501
LMArena Russian—1490
LMArena Spanish—1490

Instruction Following Not comparable

Command R7B: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 77.5 (#22)

BenchmarkCommand R7BMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Instruction Following—1477

Long Context Not comparable

Command R7B: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 45.6 (#32)

BenchmarkCommand R7BMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Longer Query—1488

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Command R7B: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 73.6 (#9)

BenchmarkCommand R7BMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text—1490
LMArena Creative Writing—1455
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1906
LMArena Multi-Turn—1482

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R7B better than Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3 has enough public results to be ranked (#27); Command R7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Command R7B or Muse Spark 1.3?

Command R7B is cheaper. It lists at $0.0375 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.3 lists at $1.25 and $4.25.

Which has the bigger context window?

Muse Spark 1.3 does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Command R7B and Muse Spark 1.3 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R7B has 1 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.3 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper