Model comparison
DBRX vs GLM-4.5-Air
GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.5-Air in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.5-Air leads 56.1 to 33.7.
Side by side
| DBRX | GLM-4.5-Air | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | 38.7 |
| Released | 2024-03-27 | 2025-07-20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 98K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.10 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.5-Air leads
DBRX: 32.3 (#262), GLM-4.5-Air: 34.5 (#225)
| Benchmark | DBRX | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | 1397 |
| GSO | — | 2.9% |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |
Reasoning GLM-4.5-Air leads
DBRX: 20.5 (#218), GLM-4.5-Air: 23.3 (#166)
| Benchmark | DBRX | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1379 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 43% |
| ForecastBench | — | 59.2 |
Math GLM-4.5-Air leads
DBRX: 22.3 (#265), GLM-4.5-Air: 33.8 (#166)
| Benchmark | DBRX | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | 1396 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 39.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge GLM-4.5-Air leads
DBRX: 14.9 (#289), GLM-4.5-Air: 34.6 (#184)
| Benchmark | DBRX | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | 1370 |
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 76.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 59.4% |
Multilingual GLM-4.5-Air leads
DBRX: 29.4 (#263), GLM-4.5-Air: 49.4 (#130)
| Benchmark | DBRX | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | 1366 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | 1427 |
| LMArena French | 1095 | 1399 |
| LMArena German | 1057 | 1376 |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | 1348 |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | 1306 |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | 1373 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | 1385 |
Instruction Following GLM-4.5-Air leads
DBRX: 57.7 (#265), GLM-4.5-Air: 69.8 (#165)
| Benchmark | DBRX | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | 1353 |
| IFEval | — | 81.2% |
Long Context GLM-4.5-Air leads
DBRX: 33.7 (#253), GLM-4.5-Air: 41.6 (#130)
| Benchmark | DBRX | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | 1367 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.5-Air leads
DBRX: 33.7 (#271), GLM-4.5-Air: 56.1 (#134)
| Benchmark | DBRX | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | 1384 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | 1343 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | 1371 |
| WildBench | — | 78.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is DBRX better than GLM-4.5-Air?
GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is DBRX or GLM-4.5-Air better for coding?
GLM-4.5-Air scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.5 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DBRX and GLM-4.5-Air share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5-Air has 27.