Model comparison
DBRX vs Hunyuan Vision 1.5
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 60.1 to 33.6.
- DBRX has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DBRX | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 43.1 |
| Released | 2024-03-27 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
DBRX: 32.9 (#266), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | 1418 |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
DBRX: 21.4 (#222), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1416 |
Math Not comparable
DBRX: 24.3 (#269), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DBRX: 14.9 (#294), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
DBRX: —, Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1180 |
Multilingual Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
DBRX: 29.3 (#268), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | — |
| LMArena French | 1096 | — |
| LMArena German | 1057 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
DBRX: 57.5 (#270), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | 1397 |
Long Context Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
DBRX: 33.7 (#258), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | 1404 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
DBRX: 33.6 (#275), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | 1422 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DBRX better than Hunyuan Vision 1.5?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is DBRX or Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better for coding?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DBRX and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9.