Model comparison

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B vs Muse Spark

Muse Spark has enough public results to be ranked (#46); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B DeepSeek

35.0

Unranked Sparse

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Muse Spark leads 46.2 to 31.2.
  • DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and Muse Spark specifications
DeepSeek Coder 1.3BMuse Spark
ProviderDeepSeekMeta
Noometry Index35.050.6
Released2023-11-022026-04-08
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked927

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark leads

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: 31.2 (#287), Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BMuse Spark
SciCode—51.5%
BigCodeBench Instruct22.8%—
LMArena Coding—1481
BigCodeBench Complete29.6%—
HumanEval+60.4%—
MBPP+54.8%—

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BMuse Spark
Epoch Capabilities Index63.6152.04
CritPt—11.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1474
WinoGrande53.3%—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BMuse Spark
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—88.9%
ProofBench—17%
LMArena Math—1455
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—39%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—14.6%
GSM8K4.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BMuse Spark
GPQA Diamond—89.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—40.6%
LMArena Expert—1457
ARC (AI2) Challenge25.4%—
MMLU25.8%—

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BMuse Spark
LMArena Vision—1306
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BMuse Spark
LMArena Non-English—1464
LMArena Chinese—1509
LMArena French—1497
LMArena German—1497
LMArena Korean—1459
LMArena Russian—1466
LMArena Spanish—1472

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BMuse Spark
LMArena Instruction Following—1442

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BMuse Spark
LMArena Longer Query—1451

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 1.3BMuse Spark
LMArena Text—1474
LMArena Creative Writing—1459
LMArena Multi-Turn—1477

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B better than Muse Spark?

Muse Spark has enough public results to be ranked (#46); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B or Muse Spark better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and Muse Spark share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper