Noometry

Model comparison

DeepSeek Coder 33B vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Gemini 3.7 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#14); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek Coder 33B DeepSeek

38.9

Unranked Sparse

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #14 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 33B scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 3.7 Flash in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 56.2 to 38.0.
  • DeepSeek Coder 33B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek Coder 33BGemini 3.7 Flash
ProviderDeepSeekGoogle
Noometry Index38.959.8
Released2023-11-022026-08-13
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.75
Output $ / M tokens—$3.75
Results tracked944

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

DeepSeek Coder 33B: 38.0 (#184), Gemini 3.7 Flash: 56.2 (#22)

BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BGemini 3.7 Flash
DeepSWE—65.5%
FrontierCode—43.6%
LMArena WebDev—1592
FrontierSWE—20.3%
SciCode—59.8%
BigCodeBench Instruct42%—
LMArena Coding—1497
BigCodeBench Complete51.1%—
ALE-Bench—904.3
HumanEval+75%—
MBPP+70.1%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.1 (#19)

BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BGemini 3.7 Flash
APEX-Agents—67.8%
Remote Labor Index—5%
GDP.pdf—23.8%

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.0 (#15)

BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BGemini 3.7 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index96.32157.27
ARC-AGI-2—84.6%
NYT Connections (extended)—94%
ARC-AGI-1—95.5%
CritPt—14.3%
Chess Puzzles—47%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1494
Mystery Game Puzzles—37%
DTBench—96.8%
LMCA—50.4%
WinoGrande62%—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.6 (#23)

BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BGemini 3.7 Flash
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—71.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—36.6%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—97.2%
ProofBench—58%
LMArena Math—1507
GSM8K35.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.7 (#5)

BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BGemini 3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond—94.8%
SimpleQA Verified—69.2%
LMArena Expert—1508
ARC (AI2) Challenge42.2%—
MMLU39.4%—

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Gemini 3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#73)

BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BGemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Vision—1316
Furniture Assembly—26.7%

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.6 (#7)

BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BGemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Non-English—1484
LMArena Chinese—1548
LMArena French—1505
LMArena German—1498
LMArena Japanese—1512
LMArena Korean—1483
LMArena Russian—1516
LMArena Spanish—1503

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Gemini 3.7 Flash: 77.7 (#15)

BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BGemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following—1483

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.7 (#30)

BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BGemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Longer Query—1492

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.2 (#20)

BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BGemini 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text—1486
LMArena Creative Writing—1490
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1723
LMArena Multi-Turn—1489

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek Coder 33B better than Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Gemini 3.7 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#14); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek Coder 33B or Gemini 3.7 Flash better for coding?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.2 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 33B and Gemini 3.7 Flash share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 33B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44.

Related comparisons

Go deeper