Model comparison

DeepSeek Coder 33B vs GLM-5.3

GLM-5.3 has enough public results to be ranked (#26); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek Coder 33B DeepSeek

38.9

Unranked Sparse

GLM-5.3 Z.ai (Zhipu)

54.8

Rank #26 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 33B scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5.3 in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where GLM-5.3 leads 59.5 to 38.0.

Side by side

DeepSeek Coder 33B and GLM-5.3 specifications
DeepSeek Coder 33BGLM-5.3
ProviderDeepSeekZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index38.954.8
Released2023-11-022026-08-14
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.40
Output $ / M tokens—$4.40
Results tracked942

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5.3 leads

DeepSeek Coder 33B: 38.0 (#184), GLM-5.3: 59.5 (#14)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BGLM-5.3
DeepSWE—69%
FrontierCode—40.1%
CursorBench—42.6%
LMArena WebDev—1622
FrontierSWE—30.2%
SciCode—59%
WeirdML—75.4%
BigCodeBench Instruct42%—
LMArena Coding—1496
BigCodeBench Complete51.1%—
ALE-Bench—1,317
HumanEval+75%—
MBPP+70.1%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, GLM-5.3: 36.4 (#38)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BGLM-5.3
APEX-Agents—56.6%
Vending-Bench 2—8,164

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, GLM-5.3: 46.1 (#46)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BGLM-5.3
Epoch Capabilities Index96.32155.61
NYT Connections (extended)—74.2%
CritPt—19.1%
Chess Puzzles—21%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1489
Mystery Game Puzzles—33%
DTBench—87.7%
LMCA—55.5%
Bench to the Future 3—0.15
WinoGrande62%—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, GLM-5.3: 62.3 (#33)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BGLM-5.3
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—68.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4—29.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—91.1%
ProofBench—49%
LMArena Math—1489
GSM8K35.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, GLM-5.3: 58.3 (#37)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BGLM-5.3
GPQA Diamond—90.9%
SimpleQA Verified—41%
LMArena Expert—1516
ARC (AI2) Challenge42.2%—
MMLU39.4%—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, GLM-5.3: 55.7 (#28)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BGLM-5.3
LMArena Non-English—1457
LMArena Chinese—1528
LMArena French—1499
LMArena German—1499
LMArena Japanese—1453
LMArena Korean—1472
LMArena Russian—1463
LMArena Spanish—1460

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, GLM-5.3: 77.5 (#23)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BGLM-5.3
LMArena Instruction Following—1477

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, GLM-5.3: 45.4 (#41)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BGLM-5.3
LMArena Longer Query—1482

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, GLM-5.3: 75.7 (#6)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BGLM-5.3
LMArena Text—1471
LMArena Creative Writing—1457
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—2075
LMArena Multi-Turn—1472

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek Coder 33B better than GLM-5.3?

GLM-5.3 has enough public results to be ranked (#26); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek Coder 33B or GLM-5.3 better for coding?

GLM-5.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.5 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 33B and GLM-5.3 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 33B has 9 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5.3 has 42.

Related comparisons

Go deeper