Model comparison

DeepSeek Coder 33B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#49); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek Coder 33B DeepSeek

38.9

Unranked Sparse

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

50.3

Rank #49 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 55.5 to 38.0.

Side by side

DeepSeek Coder 33B and MiMo-V2.6-Pro specifications
DeepSeek Coder 33BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProviderDeepSeekXiaomi
Noometry Index38.950.3
Released2023-11-022026-09-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.43
Output $ / M tokens—$0.87
Results tracked919

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

DeepSeek Coder 33B: 38.0 (#184), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena WebDev—1629
SciCode—60.9%
BigCodeBench Instruct42%—
LMArena Coding—1534
BigCodeBench Complete51.1%—
ALE-Bench—1,158
HumanEval+75%—
MBPP+70.1%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
APEX-Agents—59.5%

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
CritPt—26.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1512
Epoch Capabilities Index96.32—
WinoGrande62%—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProofBench—70%
LMArena Math—1494
GSM8K35.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Expert—1543
ARC (AI2) Challenge42.2%—
MMLU39.4%—

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Vision—1264

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Non-English—1474
LMArena Chinese—1529
LMArena Russian—1480

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following—1493

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Longer Query—1501

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text—1492
LMArena Creative Writing—1468
LMArena Multi-Turn—1464

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek Coder 33B better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#49); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek Coder 33B or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 33B and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 33B has 9 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper