Model comparison

DeepSeek Coder 33B vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max has enough public results to be ranked (#35); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek Coder 33B DeepSeek

38.3

Unranked Sparse

Qwen3.7 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

51.4

Rank #35 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 33B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Max in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 50.2 to 37.4.
  • DeepSeek Coder 33B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek Coder 33B and Qwen3.7 Max specifications
DeepSeek Coder 33BQwen3.7 Max
ProviderDeepSeekAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index38.351.4
Released2023-11-022026-05-19
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked933

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.7 Max leads

DeepSeek Coder 33B: 37.4 (#180), Qwen3.7 Max: 50.2 (#43)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BQwen3.7 Max
SWE-bench Verified—77.3%
LMArena WebDev—1515
SciCode—48.8%
BigCodeBench Instruct42%—
LMArena Coding—1498
BigCodeBench Complete51.1%—
ALE-Bench—1,189
HumanEval+75%—
MBPP+70.1%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 21.8 (#129)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BQwen3.7 Max
GBAEval—0.4%

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 48.4 (#36)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BQwen3.7 Max
Epoch Capabilities Index95.74153.74
SimpleBench—70.4%
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
CritPt—13.4%
Chess Puzzles—19%
EBR-Bench—9.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1483
Mystery Game Puzzles—32%
DTBench—92.3%
LMCA—44%
WinoGrande62%—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 62.3 (#26)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BQwen3.7 Max
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—64.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—34.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—95.6%
ProofBench—26%
LMArena Math—1488
GSM8K35.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 61.7 (#24)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BQwen3.7 Max
GPQA Diamond—90.9%
SimpleQA Verified—55.8%
LMArena Expert—1488
ARC (AI2) Challenge42.2%—
MMLU39.4%—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 57.1 (#13)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Non-English—1475
LMArena Chinese—1533
LMArena Russian—1482

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 76.9 (#34)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Instruction Following—1460

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#34)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Longer Query—1484

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek Coder 33B: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 65.2 (#52)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek Coder 33BQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Text—1476
LMArena Creative Writing—1450
EQ-Bench 4—1110
LMArena Multi-Turn—1482

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek Coder 33B better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max has enough public results to be ranked (#35); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek Coder 33B or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.2 versus 37.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 33B and Qwen3.7 Max share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 33B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper