Model comparison
Deepseek Coder v2 vs Granite 4.0 H Small
Deepseek Coder v2 and Granite 4.0 H Small score almost the same on the Noometry Index (35.9 vs 36.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeekSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher in 3 categories and Granite 4.0 H Small in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Granite 4.0 H Small leads 68.7 to 61.7.
Side by side
| Deepseek Coder v2 | Granite 4.0 H Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 36.5 |
| Released | 2024-06-17 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Deepseek Coder v2 leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 38.1 (#183), Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1251 | 1249 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.7% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 82.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 75.1% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Deepseek Coder v2: 23.6 (#176), Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1207 | 1240 |
| WinoGrande | 83.7% | — |
Math Deepseek Coder v2 leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 34.9 (#190), Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1241 | 1247 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.6% |
| GSM8K | 94.5% | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
Deepseek Coder v2: 32.3 (#212), Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1181 | 1251 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 56.9% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.2% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 38.3% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 64.3% | — |
Multilingual Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 36.3 (#240), Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1182 | 1216 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1201 | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | 1188 | 1201 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1153 | 1258 |
| LMArena French | 1185 | — |
| LMArena German | 1164 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1126 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1104 | — |
Instruction Following Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 61.7 (#242), Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1180 | 1222 |
| IFEval | — | 89% |
Long Context Too close to call
Deepseek Coder v2: 37.0 (#224), Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | 1242 |
Writing & Preference Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 38.2 (#253), Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1191 | 1241 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1120 | 1211 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1177 | 1242 |
| WildBench | — | 73.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Deepseek Coder v2 better than Granite 4.0 H Small?
Deepseek Coder v2 and Granite 4.0 H Small score almost the same on the Noometry Index (35.9 vs 36.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Deepseek Coder v2 or Granite 4.0 H Small better for coding?
Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Deepseek Coder v2 and Granite 4.0 H Small share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Deepseek Coder v2 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 H Small has 19.