Model comparison

Deepseek Coder v2 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct

Deepseek Coder v2 and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (35.9 vs 35.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Deepseek Coder v2 DeepSeek

35.9

Rank #220 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads 43.4 to 38.2.

Side by side

Deepseek Coder v2 and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct specifications
Deepseek Coder v2Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
ProviderDeepSeekNVIDIA
Noometry Index35.935.9
Released2024-06-17—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2412

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Deepseek Coder v2 leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 38.1 (#183), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 35.6 (#222)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
LMArena Coding12511223
BigCodeBench Instruct48.2%—
BigCodeBench Complete59.7%—
HumanEval+82.3%—
MBPP+75.1%—

Reasoning Too close to call

Deepseek Coder v2: 23.6 (#176), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 23.5 (#177)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts12071203
WinoGrande83.7%—

Math Too close to call

Deepseek Coder v2: 34.9 (#190), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 34.6 (#193)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
LMArena Math12411230
GSM8K94.5%—

Knowledge Too close to call

Deepseek Coder v2: 32.3 (#212), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 31.9 (#218)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
LMArena Expert11811167
ARC (AI2) Challenge64.3%—

Multilingual Too close to call

Deepseek Coder v2: 36.3 (#240), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.1 (#241)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
LMArena Non-English11821181
LMArena Chinese12011180
LMArena Russian11881187
LMArena French1185—
LMArena German1164—
LMArena Japanese1126—
LMArena Korean1104—
LMArena Spanish1153—

Instruction Following Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 61.7 (#242), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 62.9 (#233)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following11801201

Long Context Too close to call

Deepseek Coder v2: 37.0 (#224), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.5 (#230)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query12191205

Writing & Preference Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 38.2 (#253), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 43.4 (#229)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
LMArena Text11911228
LMArena Creative Writing11201213
LMArena Multi-Turn11771227

Frequently asked questions

Is Deepseek Coder v2 better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct?

Deepseek Coder v2 and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (35.9 vs 35.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Deepseek Coder v2 or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct better for coding?

Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 35.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Deepseek Coder v2 and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Deepseek Coder v2 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper