Model comparison
Deepseek Coder v2 vs MiMo-V2-Flash
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeekSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2-Flash in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 59.7 to 38.2.
Side by side
| Deepseek Coder v2 | MiMo-V2-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2024-06-17 | 2025-12-16 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Deepseek Coder v2 leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 38.1 (#183), MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1251 | 1443 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.7% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |
| HumanEval+ | 82.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 75.1% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 23.6 (#176), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1207 | 1420 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| WinoGrande | 83.7% | — |
Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 34.9 (#190), MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1241 | 1396 |
| GSM8K | 94.5% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 32.3 (#212), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1181 | 1425 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 64.3% | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 36.3 (#240), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1182 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1201 | 1462 |
| LMArena French | 1185 | 1429 |
| LMArena German | 1164 | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1126 | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | 1104 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 1188 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1153 | 1420 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 61.7 (#242), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1180 | 1392 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 37.0 (#224), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | 1409 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 38.2 (#253), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1191 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1120 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1177 | 1404 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Deepseek Coder v2 better than MiMo-V2-Flash?
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Deepseek Coder v2 or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?
Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Deepseek Coder v2 and MiMo-V2-Flash share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Deepseek Coder v2 has 24 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.