Model comparison

Deepseek Coder v2 vs Muse Spark

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Deepseek Coder v2 DeepSeek

35.9

Rank #220 Confirmed

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 32.3.
  • Deepseek Coder v2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Deepseek Coder v2 and Muse Spark specifications
Deepseek Coder v2Muse Spark
ProviderDeepSeekMeta
Noometry Index35.950.6
Released2024-06-172026-04-08
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2427

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 38.1 (#183), Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Muse Spark
LMArena Coding12511481
SciCode—51.5%
BigCodeBench Instruct48.2%—
BigCodeBench Complete59.7%—
HumanEval+82.3%—
MBPP+75.1%—

Reasoning Muse Spark leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 23.6 (#176), Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Muse Spark
LMArena Hard Prompts12071474
CritPt—11.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—152.04
WinoGrande83.7%—

Math Muse Spark leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 34.9 (#190), Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Muse Spark
LMArena Math12411455
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—88.9%
ProofBench—17%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—39%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—14.6%
GSM8K94.5%—

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 32.3 (#212), Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Muse Spark
LMArena Expert11811457
GPQA Diamond—89.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—40.6%
ARC (AI2) Challenge64.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Deepseek Coder v2: —, Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Muse Spark
LMArena Vision—1306
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Muse Spark leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 36.3 (#240), Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Muse Spark
LMArena Non-English11821464
LMArena Chinese12011509
LMArena French11851497
LMArena German11641497
LMArena Korean11041459
LMArena Russian11881466
LMArena Spanish11531472
LMArena Japanese1126—

Instruction Following Muse Spark leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 61.7 (#242), Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Muse Spark
LMArena Instruction Following11801442

Long Context Muse Spark leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 37.0 (#224), Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Muse Spark
LMArena Longer Query12191451

Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 38.2 (#253), Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Muse Spark
LMArena Text11911474
LMArena Creative Writing11201459
LMArena Multi-Turn11771477

Frequently asked questions

Is Deepseek Coder v2 better than Muse Spark?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Deepseek Coder v2 or Muse Spark better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 38.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Deepseek Coder v2 and Muse Spark share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Deepseek Coder v2 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper