Model comparison
DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Gemini 4 Argon
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
GoogleSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 4 Argon in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 8.7.
- DeepSeek LLM 67B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemini 4 Argon | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 56.5 |
| Released | 2023-11-29 | 2026-09-30 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278), Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1096 | 1550 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1678 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 55% |
| SciCode | — | 61.8% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: —, Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 82.2% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 13,718 |
Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304), Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1070 | 1548 |
| CritPt | — | 27.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 110.5 | — |
Math Gemini 4 Argon leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324), Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1108 | 1536 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.8% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 99% |
| MATH Level 5 | 6.4% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 4 Argon leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313), Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 24.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1553 |
Multimodal Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: —, Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 54.4% |
Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267), Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1073 | 1523 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1610 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1537 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1497 |
Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277), Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1079 | 1538 |
Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265), Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1092 | 1549 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282), Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1105 | 1534 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1067 | 1531 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1082 | 1557 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Gemini 4 Argon?
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Gemini 4 Argon better for coding?
Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Gemini 4 Argon share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 4 Argon has 21.