Model comparison

DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Granite 3.0 8b Instruct

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.6 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek LLM 67B DeepSeek

24.9

Rank #347 Confirmed

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct IBM

31.6

Rank #270 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 3 categories and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads 32.8 to 8.7.

Side by side

DeepSeek LLM 67B and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct specifications
DeepSeek LLM 67BGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
ProviderDeepSeekIBM
Noometry Index24.931.6
Released2023-11-29—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1514

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek LLM 67B leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.7 (#301)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Coding10961112
BigCodeBench Instruct—29.3%
BigCodeBench Complete—35.4%

Reasoning Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.9 (#230)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10701092
Chess Puzzles0%—
Epoch Capabilities Index110.5—

Math Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 32.8 (#210)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Math11081143
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250.8%—
MATH Level 56.4%—

Knowledge Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.6 (#236)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
GPQA Diamond24.6%—
LMArena Expert—1087

Multilingual DeepSeek LLM 67B leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.2 (#276)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Non-English10731037
LMArena Chinese11321063
LMArena Russian—1060

Instruction Following Too close to call

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.0 (#276)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10791088

Long Context Too close to call

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#252)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query10921122

Writing & Preference Too close to call

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#285)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Text11051096
LMArena Creative Writing10671071
LMArena Multi-Turn10821063

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Granite 3.0 8b Instruct?

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.6 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better for coding?

DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.9 versus 29.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper