Model comparison

DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Llama 2-7B

Llama 2-7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.1 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek LLM 67B DeepSeek

24.9

Rank #347 Confirmed

Llama 2-7B Meta

29.1

Rank #317 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 2-7B in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Llama 2-7B leads 30.7 to 8.7.

Side by side

DeepSeek LLM 67B and Llama 2-7B specifications
DeepSeek LLM 67BLlama 2-7B
ProviderDeepSeekMeta
Noometry Index24.929.1
Released2023-11-292023-07-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1529

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek LLM 67B leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278), Llama 2-7B: 29.2 (#307)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BLlama 2-7B
LMArena Coding10961002

Reasoning Too close to call

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304), Llama 2-7B: 15.7 (#312)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BLlama 2-7B
Chess Puzzles0%0%
LMArena Hard Prompts10701009
Epoch Capabilities Index110.599.06
BIG-Bench Hard—39.2%
HellaSwag—77.2%
LAMBADA—73.3%
PIQA—78.8%
WinoGrande—69.2%

Math Llama 2-7B leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324), Llama 2-7B: 30.7 (#233)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BLlama 2-7B
LMArena Math11081042
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250.8%—
MATH Level 56.4%—
GSM8K—16.7%

Knowledge Llama 2-7B leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313), Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#248)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BLlama 2-7B
GPQA Diamond24.6%—
LMArena Expert—1036
ARC (AI2) Challenge—45.9%
BoolQ—77.9%
MMLU—45.8%
OpenBookQA—58.6%
TriviaQA—73.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek LLM 67B: —, Llama 2-7B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BLlama 2-7B
ScienceQA—43.1%

Multilingual DeepSeek LLM 67B leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267), Llama 2-7B: 23.8 (#293)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BLlama 2-7B
LMArena Non-English1073973
LMArena Chinese1132973
LMArena French—970
LMArena German—978
LMArena Russian—995
LMArena Spanish—1007

Instruction Following DeepSeek LLM 67B leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277), Llama 2-7B: 50.8 (#298)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BLlama 2-7B
LMArena Instruction Following10791006

Long Context DeepSeek LLM 67B leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265), Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#287)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BLlama 2-7B
LMArena Longer Query1092999

Writing & Preference DeepSeek LLM 67B leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282), Llama 2-7B: 28.0 (#298)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BLlama 2-7B
LMArena Text11051053
LMArena Creative Writing10671033
LMArena Multi-Turn10821029

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Llama 2-7B?

Llama 2-7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.1 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Llama 2-7B better for coding?

DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.9 versus 29.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Llama 2-7B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-7B has 29.

Related comparisons

Go deeper