Model comparison
DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 26.8 to 8.7.
Side by side
| DeepSeek LLM 67B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 32.7 |
| Released | 2023-11-29 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1096 | 1210 |
Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1070 | 1208 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 110.5 | — |
Math Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1108 | 1208 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | 6.4% | — |
Knowledge Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 24.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
Multilingual Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1073 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1187 |
Instruction Following Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1079 | 1186 |
| IFEval | — | 78% |
Long Context Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1092 | 1194 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1105 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1067 | 1199 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1082 | 1221 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.