Model comparison
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B vs Qwen3.6 35B-A3B
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.8 vs 37.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B in 4 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 35B-A3B leads 51.3 to 30.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 51.4% for DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B and 86.7% for Qwen3.6 35B-A3B.
Side by side
| DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.8 | 37.6 |
| Released | 2025-01-20 | 2026-04-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.49 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: 36.8 (#202), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 37.2 (#196)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 35.8% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.5% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 35.3% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 51.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.9% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: —, Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 22.1 (#134)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 23% |
Reasoning Qwen3.6 35B-A3B leads
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: 24.9 (#156), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 28.0 (#109)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 52.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 41.6% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 26% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 67.6% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 22% |
| DTBench | — | 73.9% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 55.9% | — |
| LMCA | — | 29.7% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 44.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.93 |
| LiveBench | 54.5% | — |
Math Qwen3.6 35B-A3B leads
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: 36.0 (#176), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 38.9 (#121)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 51.4% | 86.7% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 20.4% |
| LiveBench Math | 58.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 89.9% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.6 35B-A3B leads
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: 30.7 (#225), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 51.3 (#68)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 55.7% | 84.8% |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: 68.2 (#190), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 69.9% | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: 49.0 (#194), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B | Qwen3.6 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 23.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B better than Qwen3.6 35B-A3B?
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.8 vs 37.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B or Qwen3.6 35B-A3B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (36.8 vs 37.2); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B has 14.