Model comparison

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) vs MiMo-V2.5

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) DeepSeek

37.0

Rank #197 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.5 Xiaomi

43.0

Rank #89 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 43.6 to 31.3.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and MiMo-V2.5 specifications
DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)MiMo-V2.5
ProviderDeepSeekXiaomi
Noometry Index37.043.0
Released2024-09-062026-04-22
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.28
Results tracked2223

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.5 leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 31.3 (#274), MiMo-V2.5: 43.6 (#75)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Coding13101469
Aider Polyglot17.8%—
LMArena WebDev—1438
SciCode—43.1%
BigCodeBench Instruct48.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete53.2%—
ALE-Bench—513.95
HumanEval+83.5%—
MBPP+74.1%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.5 leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 24.5 (#145), MiMo-V2.5: 27.8 (#98)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Hard Prompts12891450
CritPt—3.7%

Math MiMo-V2.5 leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 33.3 (#177), MiMo-V2.5: 35.4 (#145)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Math12891436
ProofBench—16%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.5 leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 34.2 (#190), MiMo-V2.5: 40.2 (#109)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Expert12661459

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): —, MiMo-V2.5: 39.0 (#53)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Vision—1245

Multilingual MiMo-V2.5 leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 42.7 (#188), MiMo-V2.5: 52.0 (#96)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Non-English12731404
LMArena Chinese13171467
LMArena French12881447
LMArena German12581421
LMArena Japanese12281304
LMArena Korean12091363
LMArena Russian12891395
LMArena Spanish12481412

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5 leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 67.7 (#189), MiMo-V2.5: 75.7 (#55)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Instruction Following12801433

Long Context MiMo-V2.5 leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 39.5 (#169), MiMo-V2.5: 44.1 (#69)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Longer Query13011444

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5 leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 50.0 (#182), MiMo-V2.5: 61.8 (#82)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)MiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text12941427
LMArena Creative Writing12851392
LMArena Multi-Turn12971445

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) better than MiMo-V2.5?

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) or MiMo-V2.5 better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 31.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and MiMo-V2.5 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) has 22 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5 has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper