Model comparison

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) vs MiniMax-M2.5

MiniMax-M2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) DeepSeek

37.0

Rank #197 Confirmed

MiniMax-M2.5 MiniMax

38.1

Rank #181 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) scores higher in 3 categories and MiniMax-M2.5 in 5 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where MiniMax-M2.5 leads 47.9 to 31.3.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and MiniMax-M2.5 specifications
DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)MiniMax-M2.5
ProviderDeepSeekMiniMax
Noometry Index37.038.1
Released2024-09-062026-02-12
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—205K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked2233

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2.5 leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 31.3 (#274), MiniMax-M2.5: 47.9 (#53)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)MiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Coding13101380
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—75.8%
Aider Polyglot17.8%—
LMArena WebDev—1386
SWE-bench Multilingual—68.3%
BigCodeBench Instruct48.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete53.2%—
ALE-Bench—618.17
HumanEval+83.5%—
MBPP+74.1%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): —, MiniMax-M2.5: 30.2 (#70)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)MiniMax-M2.5
Terminal-Bench—42.7%
Vending-Bench 2—-23.16

Reasoning DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 24.5 (#145), MiniMax-M2.5: 17.6 (#281)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)MiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Hard Prompts12891372
ARC-AGI-2—4.9%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—55.2%
NYT Connections (extended)—16.8%
ARC-AGI-1—63.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.68

Math DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 33.3 (#177), MiniMax-M2.5: 25.8 (#242)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)MiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Math12891378
ProofBench—4%

Knowledge MiniMax-M2.5 leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 34.2 (#190), MiniMax-M2.5: 38.6 (#132)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)MiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Expert12661378
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.1%

Multilingual MiniMax-M2.5 leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 42.7 (#188), MiniMax-M2.5: 47.3 (#147)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)MiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Non-English12731338
LMArena Chinese13171392
LMArena French12881363
LMArena German12581361
LMArena Japanese12281169
LMArena Korean12091232
LMArena Russian12891359
LMArena Spanish12481354

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.5 leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 67.7 (#189), MiniMax-M2.5: 71.7 (#143)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)MiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Instruction Following12801353

Long Context DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 39.5 (#169), MiniMax-M2.5: 37.4 (#211)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)MiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Longer Query13011367
CL-bench—11.4%
CL-bench Life—6.3%

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.5 leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 50.0 (#182), MiniMax-M2.5: 54.1 (#149)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)MiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Text12941359
LMArena Creative Writing12851331
LMArena Multi-Turn12971364
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1361

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) better than MiniMax-M2.5?

MiniMax-M2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) or MiniMax-M2.5 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.9 versus 31.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and MiniMax-M2.5 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) has 22 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.5 has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper