Model comparison

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#40); DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) scores higher in 0 categories and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads 52.8 to 39.8.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash specifications
DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
ProviderDeepSeekDeepSeek
Noometry Index39.750.3
Released2024-05-072026-09-09
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—393K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.15
Output $ / M tokens—$0.60
Results tracked1025

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): 39.8 (#141), DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 52.8 (#29)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena WebDev—1620
SciCode—51.9%
BigCodeBench Instruct48.9%—
LMArena Coding—1511
BigCodeBench Complete59.4%—
ALE-Bench—1,092

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 46.2 (#39)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index124.78155.01
NYT Connections (extended)—89.6%
CritPt—14.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1485
DTBench—89.9%
LMCA—47%
Surface Evolver Bench—46.3%
BIG-Bench Hard78.8%—
HellaSwag87.1%—
PIQA83.9%—
WinoGrande86.3%—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 48.4 (#52)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
ProofBench—54%
LMArena Math—1493

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 41.6 (#97)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Expert—1505
ARC (AI2) Challenge92.2%—
MMLU78.4%—
TriviaQA80%—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 55.5 (#29)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Non-English—1452
LMArena Chinese—1506
LMArena French—1448
LMArena Russian—1473
LMArena Spanish—1499

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 77.6 (#24)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following—1475

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 45.2 (#46)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Longer Query—1476

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 65.8 (#43)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text—1465
LMArena Creative Writing—1436
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1540
LMArena Multi-Turn—1460

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) better than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#40); DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better for coding?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.8 versus 39.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) has 10 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper