Model comparison

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) vs GLM-5.3-Flash

GLM-5.3-Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#45); DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5.3-Flash Z.ai (Zhipu)

49.6

Rank #45 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5.3-Flash in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where GLM-5.3-Flash leads 53.7 to 39.8.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) and GLM-5.3-Flash specifications
DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)GLM-5.3-Flash
ProviderDeepSeekZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index39.749.6
Released2024-05-072026-08-20
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.15
Output $ / M tokens—$0.50
Results tracked1036

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5.3-Flash leads

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): 39.8 (#141), GLM-5.3-Flash: 53.7 (#26)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)GLM-5.3-Flash
DeepSWE—63.4%
FrontierCode—31.8%
LMArena WebDev—1614
SciCode—51.6%
BigCodeBench Instruct48.9%—
LMArena Coding—1506
BigCodeBench Complete59.4%—
ALE-Bench—303.55

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, GLM-5.3-Flash: 34.3 (#41)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)GLM-5.3-Flash
APEX-Agents—52.8%
GDP.pdf—14%

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, GLM-5.3-Flash: 31.7 (#69)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)GLM-5.3-Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index124.78151.9
CritPt—15.4%
Chess Puzzles—14%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1490
Mystery Game Puzzles—8%
Surface Evolver Bench—52.5%
Bench to the Future 3—0.15
BIG-Bench Hard78.8%—
HellaSwag87.1%—
PIQA83.9%—
WinoGrande86.3%—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, GLM-5.3-Flash: 53.1 (#38)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)GLM-5.3-Flash
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—55.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4—17.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.9%
ProofBench—21%
LMArena Math—1499

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, GLM-5.3-Flash: 58.4 (#33)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)GLM-5.3-Flash
GPQA Diamond—90.2%
LMArena Expert—1512
ARC (AI2) Challenge92.2%—
MMLU78.4%—
TriviaQA80%—

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, GLM-5.3-Flash: 42.6 (#25)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)GLM-5.3-Flash
LMArena Vision—1304

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, GLM-5.3-Flash: 56.2 (#24)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)GLM-5.3-Flash
LMArena Non-English—1462
LMArena Chinese—1529
LMArena French—1495
LMArena German—1457
LMArena Japanese—1420
LMArena Korean—1443
LMArena Russian—1472
LMArena Spanish—1471

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, GLM-5.3-Flash: 77.8 (#17)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)GLM-5.3-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following—1480

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, GLM-5.3-Flash: 45.3 (#41)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)GLM-5.3-Flash
LMArena Longer Query—1479

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, GLM-5.3-Flash: 65.4 (#49)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)GLM-5.3-Flash
LMArena Text—1471
LMArena Creative Writing—1440
LMArena Multi-Turn—1471

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) better than GLM-5.3-Flash?

GLM-5.3-Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#45); DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) or GLM-5.3-Flash better for coding?

GLM-5.3-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.7 versus 39.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) and GLM-5.3-Flash share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) has 10 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5.3-Flash has 36.

Related comparisons

Go deeper