Model comparison

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) vs Qwen3 32B

Qwen3 32B has enough public results to be ranked (#166); DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3 32B Alibaba (Qwen)

38.8

Rank #166 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 32B in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) and Qwen3 32B specifications
DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Qwen3 32B
ProviderDeepSeekAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.738.8
Released2024-05-072025-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.70
Output $ / M tokens—$2.80
Results tracked1026

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): 39.8 (#141), Qwen3 32B: 37.3 (#184)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Qwen3 32B
Aider Polyglot—40%
SciCode—35.4%
BigCodeBench Instruct48.9%—
LMArena Coding—1358
BigCodeBench Complete59.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Qwen3 32B: 32.3 (#58)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Qwen3 32B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—48.7%

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Qwen3 32B: 19.6 (#233)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Qwen3 32B
Epoch Capabilities Index124.78138.51
Kagi LLM Benchmark—54.9%
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—5%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1335
DTBench—67.5%
LMCA—17.3%
BIG-Bench Hard78.8%—
HellaSwag87.1%—
PIQA83.9%—
WinoGrande86.3%—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Qwen3 32B: 37.9 (#89)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Qwen3 32B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—66.9%
LMArena Math—1399

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#112)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Qwen3 32B
GPQA Diamond—65.7%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.9%
LMArena Expert—1362
ARC (AI2) Challenge92.2%—
MMLU78.4%—
TriviaQA80%—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Qwen3 32B: 45.8 (#162)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Qwen3 32B
LMArena Non-English—1317
LMArena Chinese—1357
LMArena German—1341
LMArena Russian—1311

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Qwen3 32B: 69.1 (#174)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Qwen3 32B
LMArena Instruction Following—1305

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Qwen3 32B: 43.7 (#83)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Qwen3 32B
Fiction.LiveBench—74.2%
LMArena Longer Query—1327

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Qwen3 32B: 53.1 (#158)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Qwen3 32B
LMArena Text—1340
LMArena Creative Writing—1297
LMArena Multi-Turn—1331

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) better than Qwen3 32B?

Qwen3 32B has enough public results to be ranked (#166); DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) or Qwen3 32B better for coding?

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.8 versus 37.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) and Qwen3 32B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 32B has 26.

Related comparisons

Go deeper